Neurological Conditions Rating Guide

Nerve and brain conditions are among the most common and most under-rated VA disability claims. Almost all of them are rated under the same schedule: 38 CFR § 4.124a. A pinched nerve, a seizure disorder, a migraine, and the lasting effects of a head injury are scored by the same handful of rules. The schedule turns on which nerve is damaged and how badly, on how often seizures occur, and on how often headaches force you to stop. Learn the pattern once and you understand your whole claim. This guide explains the rules that decide every neurological rating, then points you to the detailed guide for your specific condition.

One-page guide: Neurological Conditions Rating Guide in One Page Neurological-system guide covering code selection, localization, motor, sensory and mental function, service-connection paths, symptoms, diagnostic testing, evidence, residuals, and common claim gaps. Opens the full-size chart, free to save or print.

The Rules That Decide Every Neurological Claim

Neurological conditions cover a wide range, from nerve damage in an arm or leg, to seizures, to migraines, to the lasting effects of a head injury. They look different, but the same schedule (38 CFR § 4.124a) rates almost all of them, and a small set of rules decides how. Understand these five ideas and you can read any neurological rating on the schedule.

1. Nerve conditions are rated on the nerve and the degree of paralysis

A peripheral nerve condition is rated on the specific nerve affected and how complete the paralysis is. Complete paralysis of a nerve carries a set rating for that nerve. Anything less is incomplete paralysis, graded mild, moderate, or severe. Neuritis (an inflamed, painful nerve) and neuralgia (nerve pain without the inflammation) are rated on the same nerve scales. Each nerve, for example the sciatic, median, ulnar, radial, or peroneal, has its own diagnostic code and its own maximum rating, so the nerve involved sets the ceiling before the degree of paralysis sets the level.

2. The rating follows the function lost, not the diagnosis label

What raises a nerve rating is how much function you have lost, not the name of the diagnosis. Sensory-only loss (numbness, tingling, altered sensation) generally caps at a lower level than loss that also includes muscle weakness, wasting, or atrophy. Two veterans with the same diagnosis on paper can land at very different ratings because one has motor loss and the other does not. This is why an exam that documents strength and muscle wasting, not just where it feels numb, matters so much.

3. Seizure disorders are rated by type and frequency over time

Convulsive disorders are rated under epilepsy, grand mal (DC 8910) and petit mal (DC 8911), on the type and frequency of seizures over time. Major (grand mal) and minor (petit mal) seizures are counted separately, because they weigh differently in the schedule. The whole rating stands or falls on frequency, so a reliable, witnessed seizure diary, dates, type, and duration, is what the rating is built on. Seizures are unpredictable and rarely happen in front of an examiner, which is exactly why the written record does the work.

4. Migraine and headaches are rated by how often they are "prostrating"

Migraine and other headaches (DC 8100) are rated by how often "prostrating" attacks occur. A prostrating attack is one that produces extreme exhaustion or powerlessness and stops ordinary activity. Lying down in a dark room can be evidence of severity, but it is not a separate words-in-the-regulation requirement. Ordinary headaches you can work through do not drive the rating. The schedule looks at how frequently the prostrating attacks come, how long they last, and how much they interfere with work, so the useful evidence is a dated log of the disabling attacks, not a count of every headache.

5. TBI residuals are rated across facets, highest facet sets the rating

Traumatic brain injury residuals (DC 8045) are rated across three areas of function: cognitive, emotional or behavioral, and physical. The examiner assigns a level to each measurable facet (memory, judgment, social interaction, and so on), and the single highest facet level sets the overall rating. Just as important, any residual that can be separately diagnosed, for example migraines or a mood disorder that grew out of the injury, is rated under its own diagnostic code rather than folded into the TBI rating. This keeps the schedule from double-counting (pyramiding) while making sure every distinct residual is captured.

The nerve sets the ceiling, the degree sets the level. On a peripheral-nerve claim, first find the code for the nerve that is affected, then read where "mild," "moderate," "severe," and "complete" fall on that nerve's scale. For the exact levels on any single nerve, open its condition lookup page or the dedicated guide below.

Choose the Neurological Rating Lane and Localize the Disability

Neurological claims start with localization: which nerve, which disease, which residual. Find the lane, then document what that lane actually reads:

Rating laneWhat controlsRecords that show it
Peripheral nerveWhat controlsExact nerve, side and dominant hand when applicable, sensory loss, motor loss, reflexes, atrophy, and incomplete or complete paralysis. Wholly sensory involvement is Mild, or at most moderate, under the schedule's general ruleRecords that show itNeurological examination, strength, sensation and reflex findings, nerve testing when medically indicated, functional record
Cranial nerveWhat controlsThe exact cranial nerve and the loss of motor, sensory, or organ function it causesRecords that show itCranial-nerve examination and condition-specific eye, ear, speech, swallow, or facial findings
Migraine or headacheWhat controlsFrequency of characteristic prostrating attacks, duration, treatment, and occupational effect; the 50-percent level also requires very frequent, completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptabilityRecords that show itDated attack log, treatment records, work or ordinary-activity effect, clinician assessment
Seizure disorderWhat controlsType and verified frequency over time; competent and consistent lay evidence can establish frequency (see 38 CFR § 4.121)Records that show itMedical diagnosis, treatment, witnessed descriptions, a consistent seizure record, hospitalization when applicable
Central or degenerative diseaseWhat controlsActive disease, the code's minimum rule, progression, and distinct residualsRecords that show itNeurological diagnosis, imaging and testing as medically indicated, serial examinations, mobility and function
Traumatic brain injuryWhat controlsHighest facet for cognitive and other unclassified residuals, plus separate evaluation of distinct diagnoses without rating the same manifestation twiceRecords that show itTBI examination, cognitive testing, mental-health and neurologic evaluation, residual-specific examinations
A complete neurological report localizes the problem and describes function. It identifies the diagnosis and location, the side and dominance where relevant, strength, reflexes, sensation, atrophy, gait, balance, falls, devices, speech or swallowing, episode frequency, cognitive findings, and the ordinary functions affected. Nerve-conduction testing can help identify a nerve, but it is not a universal requirement when competent clinical evidence establishes the disability.

Track detail: migraines, TBI, carpal tunnel, sciatica and radiculopathy, and restless legs.

Neurological Disease Can Produce Residuals Across the Body

A nervous-system diagnosis often shows up as a problem somewhere else. Each residual has to be distinguished and documented where it is evaluated:

Residual groupExamples to distinguishRating location
Motor and sensoryExamples to distinguishWeakness, paralysis, numbness, pain, atrophyRating locationThe exact peripheral or cranial nerve, or the disease code
Gait and balanceExamples to distinguishFalls, ataxia, dizziness, assistive devicesRating locationThe neurological or vestibular code as applicable
Speech and swallowingExamples to distinguishDysarthria, aphasia, dysphagiaRating locationThe distinct diagnosis or the applicable neurologic residual code
Vision, hearing, smell, and tasteExamples to distinguishSensory loss tied to the neurologic disease or to TBIRating locationThe appropriate eye, ear, or neurologic code
Cognition and moodExamples to distinguishMemory, judgment, executive function, a diagnosed mental disorderRating locationA TBI facet or a separate mental diagnosis, without rating the same manifestation twice
Bladder and bowelExamples to distinguishNeurogenic bladder, incontinence, bowel dysfunctionRating locationThe appropriate genitourinary or digestive code when distinctly diagnosed
Autonomic and endocrineExamples to distinguishBlood-pressure regulation, sweating, hormone deficiency, other autonomic effectsRating locationThe applicable body-system code with competent relationship evidence
A possible residual category is not proof of a residual. The TBI schedule itself names many possible residual areas, including motor and sensory function, vision and hearing, smell and taste, seizures, gait and balance, speech, bladder and bowel function, cranial and autonomic nerves, endocrine effects, cognition, and behavior. That a category exists does not establish that a particular residual was caused by the injury. The record still has to establish the diagnosis and the relationship, and the same manifestation cannot be rated twice.

Neurological Presumptions Are Disease-Specific, Not System-Wide

There is no presumption for nervous-system conditions as a group. Each rule below names its own disease and its own service requirements:

Disease or routeCurrent rule to explain
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisCurrent rule to explainALS developing at any time after separation is enough to establish service connection, subject to the exceptions, which include willful misconduct, affirmative evidence against incurrence, and a requirement of 90 days or more of continuous active service (see 38 CFR § 3.318)
Multiple sclerosisCurrent rule to explainThe chronic-disease framework uses a seven-year manifestation period rather than the ordinary one year (see 38 CFR § 3.307 and § 3.309)
Other listed chronic nervous-system diseaseCurrent rule to explainThe exact disease and its applicable manifestation period control. A neurological symptom by itself is not a system-wide presumption
Parkinson's disease or ParkinsonismCurrent rule to explainCurrent VA herbicide-presumptive lists apply when the exposure and service requirements are met
Specified conditions after traumatic brain injuryCurrent rule to explainParkinsonism, unprovoked seizures, specified dementias, depression, and certain hormone-deficiency diseases are held proximately due to a service-connected moderate or severe TBI under the regulation's severity and time limits (see 38 CFR § 3.310(d)). Conditions outside those exact rules use the ordinary secondary-evidence path
Direct or secondaryCurrent rule to explainA current diagnosis, the relevant service or service-connected condition, and competent evidence connecting them

Find the Guide for Your Condition

The rules above apply across the board. For the exact rating levels, the C&P exam, and the Board data for your specific condition, open the dedicated guide:

AreaGuideDC codes
Traumatic brain injury (TBI)TBI Claims Guide8045
Migraine and headachesMigraine Claims Guide8100
Carpal tunnel (median nerve)Carpal Tunnel Guide8515
Sciatica and radiculopathySciatica & Radiculopathy Guide8520

Most peripheral-nerve codes (the 8510 to 8540, 8610 to 8640, and 8710 to 8740 ranges) rate by incomplete paralysis graded mild, moderate, or severe; seizure disorders sit at 8910 and 8911. For any code not listed, open its condition lookup page for the rating levels and Board data.

Every Neurological Diagnostic Code, With Board Outcomes

Every diagnostic code in this body system, ordered by how often it reaches the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Percentages are the share of each code's Board issues granted, denied, or remanded (sent back for more development); dismissed and other outcomes are not shown, so rows do not sum to 100%. Each code links to its full page: rating criteria, evidence notes, and secondary-condition data.

DCConditionBoard appealsGrantedDeniedRemanded
8520Paralysis of sciatic nerve91,50721.5%30.8%41.4%
8100Migraine76,31726.3%28%39.9%
8515Paralysis of median nerve42,30218.3%34.2%41.3%
8045Residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI)34,34715.7%35.1%42.6%
8516Paralysis of ulnar nerve5,67617.7%32.3%45.3%
8510Paralysis of upper radicular group (fifth and sixth cervicals)4,92115.2%22%59.5%
8018Multiple sclerosis4,55322.8%30%42.6%
8004Paralysis agitans4,05928.3%20.4%47.1%
8910Epilepsy, grand mal4,00020.9%48.5%24.6%
8513Paralysis of all radicular groups2,66224.5%45%29.5%
8620Neuritis of sciatic nerve2,52316.6%52.5%28.1%
8007Brain, vessels, embolism of2,48417.6%47.3%25%
8615Neuritis of median nerve2,39419%39.7%37.3%
8521Paralysis of external popliteal nerve (common peroneal)2,27931.2%44.6%20.9%
8002Brain, new growths of, malignant2,27819.1%30.6%43%
8612Neuritis of lower radicular group2,25622%34.9%38.3%
8009Brain, vessels, hemorrhage from2,02115.6%37.2%41.4%
8720Neuralgia of sciatic nerve1,87627.5%35.7%32.5%
8514Paralysis of musculospiral nerve (radial nerve)1,74229.7%47%18.8%
8625Neuritis of posterior tibial nerve1,6759.2%14.1%74.6%
8526Paralysis of anterior crural nerve (femoral)1,65825.6%35.9%32.8%
8108Narcolepsy1,37020.1%30.6%42.3%
8008Brain, vessels, thrombosis of1,3339.1%17%70.1%
8103Tic, convulsive1,30011.1%18.3%65.7%
8019Meningitis, cerebrospinal, epidemic1,15011.5%41.4%41.4%
8512Paralysis of lower radicular group1,03626.6%33.9%36.1%
8614Neuritis of musculospiral nerve (radial nerve)96326.7%35.9%32.4%
8721Neuralgia of external popliteal nerve (common peroneal)78931.2%48.3%15.7%
8207Paralysis of seventh (facial) cranial nerve73513.7%40.8%42.2%
8003Benign, minimum71015.2%37.2%44.6%
8025Myasthenia gravis62418.1%28.7%48.7%
8405Neuralgia of fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerve62422.6%30%43.4%
8529Paralysis of external cutaneous nerve of thigh62119.2%29%46.7%
8622Neuritis of musculocutaneous nerve (superficial peroneal)6199.7%26.2%56.9%
8305Neuritis of fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerve59327.5%35.2%30.9%
8610Neuritis of upper radicular group (fifth and sixth cervicals)55323.1%19.9%52.4%
8525Paralysis of posterior tibial nerve49219.1%34.3%40%
8010Myelitis44318.7%26.6%51.5%
8011Poliomyelitis, anterior43714.9%30%50.1%
8911Epilepsy, petit mal43119.3%44.1%29.7%
8712Neuralgia of lower radicular group43017.7%16.7%64%
8046Cerebral arteriosclerosis40914.9%21.3%61.9%
8017Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis40024.5%31.3%31.3%
8715Neuralgia of median nerve38326.1%52.5%19.6%
8524Paralysis of internal popliteal nerve (tibial)33629.5%28.6%38.7%
8024Syringomyelia33520.6%24.8%49.9%
8307Neuritis of seventh (facial) cranial nerve33520%34.3%41.8%
8104Paramyoclonus multiplex (convulsive state, myoclonic type)28012.5%18.2%67.5%
8914Epilepsy, psychomotor27611.2%22.5%63.4%
8523Paralysis of anterior tibial nerve (deep peroneal)26527.5%29.4%38.1%
8626Neuritis of anterior crural nerve (femoral)26326.6%20.5%50.6%
8629Neuritis of external cutaneous nerve of thigh21118.5%16.1%62.1%
8613Neuritis of all radicular groups19625%42.9%29.6%
8621Neuritis of external popliteal nerve (common peroneal)18229.7%48.4%17.6%
8710Neuralgia of upper radicular group (fifth and sixth cervicals)18217%32.4%47.3%
8616Neuritis of ulnar nerve16025.6%41.9%26.3%
8714Neuralgia of musculospiral nerve (radial nerve)15925.2%52.2%20.8%
8517Paralysis of musculocutaneous nerve14126.2%48.2%21.3%
8522Paralysis of musculocutaneous nerve (superficial peroneal)14037.1%54.3%7.1%
8912Epilepsy, Jacksonian and focal motor or sensory13720.4%32.8%40.9%
8530Paralysis of ilio-inguinal nerve11726.5%44.4%23.9%
8528Paralysis of obturator nerve11626.7%31.9%35.3%
8511Paralysis of middle radicular group10822.2%50.9%26.9%
8713Neuralgia of all radicular groups7425.7%29.7%44.6%
8717Neuralgia of musculocutaneous nerve7337%57.5%1.4%
8725Neuralgia of posterior tibial nerve6421.9%37.5%37.5%
8519Paralysis of long thoracic nerve5920.3%37.3%39%
8309Neuritis of ninth (glossopharyngeal) cranial nerve4242.9%28.6%28.6%
8005Bulbar palsy397.7%48.7%41%
8540Soft-tissue sarcoma (of neurogenic origin)3920.5%30.8%46.2%
8726Neuralgia of anterior crural nerve (femoral)3850%34.2%15.8%
8913Epilepsy, diencephalic238.7%60.9%13%
8611Neuritis of middle radicular group1931.6%26.3%36.8%
Show 46 more codes with too few Board appeals to report (expand)
DCConditionBoard appealsGrantedDeniedRemanded
8000Encephalitis, epidemic, chronicToo few Board appeals to report
8012HematomyeliaToo few Board appeals to report
8013Syphilis, cerebrospinalToo few Board appeals to report
8014Syphilis, meningovascularToo few Board appeals to report
8015Tabes dorsalisToo few Board appeals to report
8020Brain, abscess ofToo few Board appeals to report
8021Spinal cord, new growths of, malignantToo few Board appeals to report
8022Benign, minimum ratingToo few Board appeals to report
8023Progressive muscular atrophyToo few Board appeals to report
8105Chorea, Sydenham'sToo few Board appeals to report
8106Chorea, Huntington'sToo few Board appeals to report
8107Athetosis, acquiredToo few Board appeals to report
8205Paralysis of fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8209Paralysis of ninth (glossopharyngeal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8210Paralysis of tenth (pneumogastric, vagus) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8211Paralysis of eleventh (spinal accessory, external branch) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8212Paralysis of twelfth (hypoglossal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8310Neuritis of tenth (pneumogastric, vagus) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8311Neuritis of eleventh (spinal accessory, external branch) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8312Neuritis of twelfth (hypoglossal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8407Neuralgia of seventh (facial) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8409Neuralgia of ninth (glossopharyngeal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8410Neuralgia of tenth (pneumogastric, vagus) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8411Neuralgia of eleventh (spinal accessory, external branch) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8412Neuralgia of twelfth (hypoglossal) cranial nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8518Paralysis of circumflex nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8527Paralysis of internal saphenous nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8617Neuritis of musculocutaneous nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8618Neuritis of circumflex nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8619Neuritis of long thoracic nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8623Neuritis of anterior tibial nerve (deep peroneal)Too few Board appeals to report
8624Neuritis of internal popliteal nerve (tibial)Too few Board appeals to report
8627Neuritis of internal saphenous nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8628Neuritis of obturator nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8630Neuritis of ilio-inguinal nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8711Neuralgia of middle radicular groupToo few Board appeals to report
8716Neuralgia of ulnar nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8718Neuralgia of circumflex nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8719Neuralgia of long thoracic nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8722Neuralgia of musculocutaneous nerve (superficial peroneal)Too few Board appeals to report
8723Neuralgia of anterior tibial nerve (deep peroneal)Too few Board appeals to report
8724Neuralgia of internal popliteal nerve (tibial)Too few Board appeals to report
8727Neuralgia of internal saphenous nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8728Neuralgia of obturator nerveToo few Board appeals to report
8729Neuralgia of external cutaneous nerve of thighToo few Board appeals to report
8730Neuralgia of ilio-inguinal nerveToo few Board appeals to report

Counts from RateMyVSO's index of published BVA decisions, refreshed weekly. A remand is not a loss; it means the Board needed more evidence before deciding. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction for any claim.

Common Secondary Conditions

Nerve conditions are unusual in that they are just as often the secondary claim as the primary one. A nerve problem frequently traces back to another service-connected condition, and a brain or nerve injury in turn opens the door to further secondary claims:

  • Peripheral neuropathy secondary to diabetes. Diabetic nerve damage in the hands and feet is one of the most common secondary claims, flowing from a service-connected diabetes rating.
  • Radiculopathy secondary to a spine condition. A service-connected back or neck disability that pinches a nerve root produces radiating leg or arm pain, rated separately under the nerve codes. See the lumbar spine guide and the sciatica guide.
  • Depression or anxiety secondary to chronic pain or TBI. Long-term nerve pain and the lasting effects of a head injury drive mental-health conditions, which can be claimed as secondary. See secondary conditions.
  • Migraines secondary to TBI or a neck injury. Headaches that begin after a head or neck injury are commonly rated as secondary to that injury under DC 8100.

Each dedicated guide above shows the live Board grant rates for that condition's most common secondary pairings.

Records That Show What the Schedule Measures

A neurological file has to localize the disability and describe function. Beyond the complete report fields above, these are the records each lane leans on:

  • Nerve conduction studies and EMG for neuropathy. These objective tests help identify which nerve is affected and distinguish sensory from motor loss. The rating still follows the complete clinical record, strength, reflexes, sensation, atrophy, pain, and functional loss, so they strengthen a claim without being a universal prerequisite.
  • A witnessed seizure log that records date, type (major or minor), duration, recovery, witness, and treatment. Because seizures rarely happen in front of an examiner, competent and consistent lay evidence can establish frequency (38 CFR 4.121); the strongest diary carries those details, though the record as a whole still has to hold together.
  • A prostrating-attack headache diary, tracking how often the disabling attacks come and what you cannot do during them, so the examiner can rate the frequency the schedule asks about.
  • Neuropsychological testing for TBI, which measures the cognitive facets (memory, attention, judgment) that set the residual rating.
  • Imaging and disease-specific testing where the diagnosis calls for it, plus serial examinations for a progressive condition, so the record shows the course over time rather than one visit.
  • A residual inventory across systems, documenting gait, balance, speech, swallowing, vision, hearing, bladder or bowel, and autonomic findings in the body system that evaluates each one.
  • The matching DBQ for the condition, which prompts the examiner to capture the right findings. See the DBQ guide.

Evidence Cited in Published Migraines Decisions

We analyzed 70,852 published Board decisions involving migraines for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 60%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Bar length shows decisions citing the evidence.

Prostrating attacks documented
18,680 decisions76.8% favorable
Attack frequency documented by a provider
18,354 decisions76.9% favorable
Headaches reported since service (continuity)
15,191 decisions67.3% favorable
Missed work or economic impact from headaches
1,145 decisions79.7% favorable
Headache log, journal, or diary
975 decisions81.0% favorable

Evidence Cited in Published Traumatic brain injury Decisions

We analyzed 24,825 published Board decisions involving traumatic brain injury for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 55.6%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Bar length shows decisions citing the evidence.

Memory or concentration deficits documented
8,785 decisions66.9% favorable
Head injury event documented (LOC, blast, concussion)
7,522 decisions62.1% favorable
Post-traumatic headaches documented
6,639 decisions65.7% favorable
TBI facet-based evaluation discussed
3,102 decisions72.1% favorable
Neuropsychological testing performed
1,900 decisions62.5% favorable

Evidence Cited in Published Sciatic nerve (radiculopathy) Decisions

We analyzed 63,783 published Board decisions involving sciatic nerve (radiculopathy) for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 64%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Bar length shows decisions citing the evidence.

Severity characterized (mild / moderate / severe incomplete paralysis)
19,473 decisions78.1% favorable
Straight-leg-raise or neurological exam findings
15,959 decisions77.5% favorable
Radiating pain into the leg documented
12,387 decisions77.6% favorable
EMG / nerve conduction study findings
7,190 decisions68.3% favorable
Foot drop or muscle weakness findings
4,448 decisions71.6% favorable

By diagnostic code

These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. A code retired in the schedule rewrites appears without a link, because its decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.

Bar length shows published decisions reviewed.

DC 8520 Paralysis of sciatic nerve
61,744 decisions5,075 granted · 64.2% favorable
DC 8521 Paralysis of external popliteal nerve (common peroneal)
2,501 decisions236 granted · 60.1% favorable

Evidence Cited in Published Parkinson's disease Decisions

We analyzed 5,286 published Board decisions involving parkinson's disease for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 50.7%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Bar length shows decisions citing the evidence.

Tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia documented
2,275 decisions58.5% favorable
Herbicide (Agent Orange) presumption addressed
1,881 decisions57.7% favorable
Individual residuals rated (tremor, gait, speech)
357 decisions67.2% favorable
Neurology evaluation documented
268 decisions59.7% favorable
Parkinson's medication documented
121 decisions64.5% favorable

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Migraines Decisions

We analyzed 6,219 granted Board decisions involving migraines for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Bar length shows decisions. Percentages remain context.

Nausea
2,105 decisions33.8% of granted
Sensitivity to light (photophobia)
2,085 decisions33.5% of granted
Throbbing or pulsating head pain
1,496 decisions24.1% of granted
Vomiting
1,138 decisions18.3% of granted
Vision changes or blurred vision
979 decisions15.7% of granted
Dizziness
956 decisions15.4% of granted
Sensitivity to sound (phonophobia)
908 decisions14.6% of granted

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Traumatic brain injury Decisions

We analyzed 1,502 granted Board decisions involving traumatic brain injury for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Bar length shows decisions. Percentages remain context.

Headaches
715 decisions47.6% of granted
Memory problems
340 decisions22.6% of granted
Difficulty concentrating
279 decisions18.6% of granted
Attention deficits
235 decisions15.6% of granted
Dizziness
198 decisions13.2% of granted

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Sciatic nerve (radiculopathy) Decisions

We analyzed 5,283 granted Board decisions involving sciatic nerve (radiculopathy) for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Bar length shows decisions. Percentages remain context.

Numbness
754 decisions14.3% of granted
Paresthesias / dysesthesias
523 decisions9.9% of granted
Intermittent or radiating pain
438 decisions8.3% of granted
Weakness
278 decisions5.3% of granted
Tingling
215 decisions4.1% of granted

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Parkinson's disease Decisions

We analyzed 965 granted Board decisions involving parkinson's disease for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Bar length shows decisions. Percentages remain context.

Tremor
227 decisions23.5% of granted
Falls or balance problems
121 decisions12.5% of granted
Rigidity
75 decisions7.8% of granted
Depression
42 decisions4.4% of granted
Constipation
27 decisions2.8% of granted

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Common Mistakes

  • Claiming "headaches" without documenting prostrating frequency. DC 8100 rates how often prostrating attacks occur, attacks of extreme exhaustion or powerlessness that stop ordinary activity. A claim that describes headaches but never records those attacks gives the examiner nothing to rate.
  • A thin clinical record for neuropathy. EMG and nerve-conduction testing can help identify the affected nerve and distinguish sensory from motor loss, but the regulation does not make them a universal prerequisite; the rating follows the complete clinical record. What sinks claims is a record with no measured strength, reflexes, sensation, or functional loss at all.
  • Letting a TBI absorb separately-ratable residuals. Migraines, a mood disorder, or other distinct residuals of a head injury are rated under their own codes, not folded into the TBI rating. Rolling them together can cost a higher combined rating.
  • Not connecting the nerve condition to its cause. Neuropathy tied to diabetes, or radiculopathy tied to the spine, is a secondary claim. Filing the nerve condition on its own, without linking it, misses the connection the schedule rewards.
  • No seizure diary. Frequency is the whole rating for a seizure disorder. With no witnessed log of dates and type, the frequency, and therefore the rating, is left unproven.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the VA rate nerve damage?
Peripheral nerve conditions are rated under 38 CFR 4.124a on the specific nerve affected and how complete the paralysis is. Complete paralysis of a nerve carries a set rating for that nerve; anything less is incomplete paralysis, graded mild, moderate, or severe. The rating also follows the function lost, so sensory-only loss generally rates lower than loss that includes muscle weakness or atrophy.
What makes a headache "prostrating"?
A prostrating attack is one that produces extreme exhaustion or powerlessness and stops ordinary activity. Lying down in a dark, quiet room can be evidence of how severe an attack is, but the regulation does not make lying down a separate requirement. Ordinary headaches you can work through do not drive the DC 8100 rating; the schedule reads frequency, duration, and interference with work, so a dated log of the disabling attacks is the useful evidence.
How is epilepsy rated?
Epilepsy is rated under DC 8910 (grand mal) and DC 8911 (petit mal) by the type and frequency of seizures over time, counting major and minor seizures separately. Because frequency is the whole rating and seizures rarely happen in front of an examiner, a reliable witnessed seizure diary with dates, type, and duration is what the rating is built on.
How are TBI residuals rated?
Traumatic brain injury residuals (DC 8045) are rated across cognitive, emotional or behavioral, and physical facets. The examiner assigns a level to each facet, and the single highest facet level sets the overall rating. Any residual that can be separately diagnosed, such as migraines or a mood disorder, is rated under its own code rather than folded into the TBI rating, which avoids double-counting (pyramiding).
Is nerve-conduction or EMG testing always required?
No. Nerve-conduction studies and EMG are useful because they help identify which nerve is affected and separate sensory from motor loss, but the rating follows the complete clinical record: strength, reflexes, sensation, atrophy, pain, and functional loss. Competent clinical evidence can establish the disability without those studies, so their absence is not by itself a reason a nerve condition cannot be evaluated.
Are all neurological diseases presumptive?
No. Presumptions here are disease-specific. ALS has its own rule, multiple sclerosis uses a seven-year manifestation period instead of the ordinary one year, Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism appear on the herbicide lists when the exposure and service requirements are met, and a specific set of conditions is tied to a service-connected moderate or severe TBI under stated severity and time limits. A neurological symptom by itself is not a presumption, and a condition outside those exact rules runs through the ordinary direct or secondary path.
Is neuropathy from diabetes ratable?
Yes. Peripheral neuropathy caused by a service-connected diabetes condition is one of the most common secondary claims. It is rated on the affected nerve and the degree of paralysis under 38 CFR 4.124a, the same as any other nerve condition, and it is claimed as secondary to the diabetes rating.

Related Tools and Guides

Sources: 38 CFR 4.124a, neurological conditions and convulsive disorders. Educational only, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim. Rating criteria and case law change; confirm current details in 38 CFR Part 4. For help with your claim, find a VA-accredited representative.